<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Watt&apos;s Going On?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2008-10-26://9</id>
    <updated>2010-07-15T21:34:17Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Congress Passes Law to End Secrecy in Oil, Gas, and Mining Industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/07/congress-passes-law-to-end-secrecy-in-oil-gas-and-mining-industry.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4601</id>

    <published>2010-07-15T21:32:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-15T21:34:17Z</updated>

    <summary> International humanitarian organization Oxfam America commends the U.S. Congress for making disclosure of payments from oil and mining companies to governments around the world a legal requirement. Included as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation passed by the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Mining" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Government" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[ International humanitarian organization Oxfam America commends the 
U.S. Congress for making disclosure of payments from oil and mining 
companies to governments around the world a legal requirement. Included 
as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation passed by the 
House and Senate, this historic measure will increase financial 
transparency in the oil, gas, and mining industry and help reduce the 
corruption, mismanagement, and conflict that are too often associated 
with natural resource extraction booms.<br /><br /><p>"Congress has made an 
unprecedented commitment to financial transparency and good governance 
in a sector that not only affects American wallets, but also some of the
 most vulnerable communities around the world," said <span class="xn-person">Raymond C. Offenheiser</span>, president of Oxfam 
America. "Secrecy of oil, gas and mining company payments to governments
 fosters government corruption and violent conflict in resource-rich 
countries that are home to more than half of the world's poorest people.
 Instability in these regions poses a long-term threat to national 
security, foreign policy, and economic interests in <span class="xn-location">the United States</span>."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The language included 
in the financial services reform measure was based on the Energy 
Security through Transparency Act (S. 1700), a bipartisan Senate bill 
championed by Senators Lugar (R-IN) and Cardin (D-MD). The new law 
creates a low-cost, uniform transparency method for oil, gas, and mining
 companies registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission 
(SEC) and covers more than 90 percent of internationally operating oil 
companies and many of the top international mining companies. Companies 
will be required to publicly disclose payments for the extraction of 
oil, gas, and minerals on a country-by-country and project basis as part
 of financial statements that are already required by the SEC. This not 
only includes American companies but also many foreign companies, such 
as Shell and BP, as well as companies from emerging markets such as <span class="xn-location">China</span>, <span class="xn-location">India</span>,
 <span class="xn-location">Brazil</span>, and <span class="xn-location">Russia</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"This provision is a 
critical part of the increased transparency and corporate responsibility
 that we are striving to achieve in the financial industry. Given the 
catastrophic events in the <span class="xn-location">Gulf of Mexico</span>,
 oil companies, in particular, should well understand that secrecy 
fosters instability, corruption and greater risk," said Senator Cardin. 
"We now have the tools to help people in resource-rich countries hold 
their leaders accountable for the money made from their oil, gas and 
minerals." &nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Too often, oil money 
intended for a nation's poor ends up lining the pockets of the rich or 
is squandered on showcase projects instead of productive investments," 
said Senator Lugar when he spoke in favor of the measure when it was 
offered as an amendment to the Senate financial reform bill in late May.
 (The Cardin-Lugar amendment was co-sponsored by Senators Durbin (D-IL),
 Schumer (D-NY), Feingold (D-WI), Merkley (D-OR), and Johnson (D-SD).) 
He added: &nbsp;"This 'resource curse' affects us as well as producing 
countries. It exacerbates global poverty which can be a seedbed for 
terrorism, it empowers autocrats and dictators, and it can crimp world 
petroleum supplies by breeding instability."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"We applaud Senators 
Cardin and Lugar for spearheading this effort in the Senate that will 
both level the playing field for oil, gas, and mining companies and help
 citizens hold their governments accountable for using revenues for 
economic development and poverty reduction. We also thank Senator Leahy 
for offering the measure during the House-Senate conference process and 
House Financial Services Chairman <span class="xn-person">Barney Frank</span>
 for his early leadership on transparency in the oil and mining 
industries and for his support for this measure that demonstrates U.S. 
commitment to transparent business practices and accountable 
governance," said Offenheiser.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Passing this law sets 
up an international standard for the public disclosure of natural 
resource revenue information, but its effectiveness will be determined 
by strict implementation by lawmakers and development of effective 
implementing regulations by the SEC. Companies should heed the call for 
transparency so citizens of resource-rich countries can begin to use 
this information to hold their governments accountable for using 
revenues to address essential services like healthcare, education, and 
job creation."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Oxfam America calls on 
the SEC to quickly undertake its rule-making process to implement this 
important measure as Congress intended. "Oxfam America and its allies in
 the Publish What You Pay campaign will be closely following the 
rule-making process to ensure this groundbreaking disclosure measure is 
quickly put in place," said Offenheiser.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><i>Oxfam America is an 
international relief and development organization that creates lasting 
solutions to poverty, hunger, and injustice. Together with individuals 
and local groups in more than 100 countries, Oxfam saves lives, helps 
people overcome poverty, and fights for social justice. Oxfam America is
 an affiliate of the international confederation Oxfam.</i></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>As Eastern U.S. Sizzles, U.S. Nuclear Plants Operate at Exceptional Levels to Stabilize Grid</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/07/as-eastern-us-sizzles-us-nuclear-plants-operate-at-exceptional-levels-to-stabilize-grid.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4590</id>

    <published>2010-07-09T22:35:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-09T22:36:02Z</updated>

    <summary>As the Eastern United States suffered through record-breaking triple-digit temperatures threatening brownouts and blackouts, the nation&apos;s nuclear power plants posted an average operating capacity of 97 percent July 4-7.Eighty-five reactors across the country ran at 100 percent operating capacity during...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Nuclear Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[As the <span class="xn-location">Eastern United States</span> 
suffered through record-breaking triple-digit temperatures threatening 
brownouts and blackouts, the nation's nuclear power plants posted an 
average operating capacity of 97 percent <span class="xn-chron">July 4-7</span>.<br /><br /><p>Eighty-five reactors 
across the country ran at 100 percent operating capacity during the 
entire week. One hundred two of the nation's 104 nuclear power plants 
were operational this week, with two plants offline for refueling and 
maintenance work.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"The reliability of 
nuclear energy facilities in not only powering America's economy, but 
also in cooling homes and offices in extreme conditions, was vital to 
the stability of our electric grid," said <span class="xn-person">Alex 
Marion</span>, vice president of nuclear operations for the Nuclear 
Energy Institute.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Data on plant operating
 capacity is reported in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's daily 
power reactor status reports every morning. Specific plant operating 
status can be found on the NRC website at <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='98137679';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/reactor-status/2010/index.html">http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/reactor-status/2010/index.html</a>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The nation's 104 
nuclear power plants operating in 31 states have a combined generating 
capacity of 100,755 megawatts of electricity, enough to meet the 
electricity needs of more than 60 million Americans.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		<p><br /></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>BP Blowout Shows &apos;Safety Systems Should Protect Workers, Environment First,&apos; EDF Testifies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/06/bp-blowout-shows-safety-systems-should-protect-workers-environment-first-edf-testifies.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4577</id>

    <published>2010-06-30T19:57:17Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-30T20:00:27Z</updated>

    <summary>Group Says Blowout Prevention Act is &quot;Good Start to Safeguarding High-Risk Wells&quot; &quot;Safety systems should be designed to protect workers and the environment first, not exploration and production budgets,&quot; according to congressional testimony today by a conservation group that has...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Offshore Drilling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><b><i>Group Says Blowout Prevention Act is "Good Start to 
Safeguarding High-Risk Wells"</i></b></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><span class="xn-location"></span>"Safety systems should be designed to 
protect workers and the environment first, not exploration and 
production budgets," according to <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='97473199';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.edf.org/oilspill">congressional 
testimony today</a> by a conservation group that has worked on Gulf 
Coast restoration for more than three decades.</p><p>"The loss of 11 lives 
on the Deepwater Horizon was the tragic beginning of a series of losses 
that continue to mount, including the accelerated loss of wildlife and 
wetlands, the impacts on sport and commercial fishermen and their 
associated industries, and the loss of tourism," testified <span class="xn-person">Elgie Holstein</span>, oil spill response coordinator 
for <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='97473199';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.edf.org/">Environmental Defense Fund</a>
 during a hearing on draft legislation, the "Blowout Prevent Act," 
before the House Energy and&nbsp;Environment Subcommittee.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Yet wells in far 
deeper water have been drilled and will become commonplace in years to 
come," added Holstein, formerly Chief of Staff at the U.S. Department of
 Energy and Assistant Secretary of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration. &nbsp;"Even wells that are not drilled in deep water may, 
depending on the geologic, geographic and environmental setting, present
 a risk to public and worker safety, the environment, and the economy. 
&nbsp;This draft legislation is a good start to safe-guarding high-risk wells
 that are an increasing part of our domestic energy development."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The draft legislation, 
the "<a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='97473199';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100628/Section.by.Section.BPAct.2010.6.28.pdf">Blowout
 Prevent Act</a>," would require regulations for "high-risk wells," 
which are defined as "all offshore oil and gas wells and the subset of 
onshore wells that, under criteria established by the appropriate 
federal official, could lead to substantial harm to public health and 
safety and the environment in the event of a blowout." &nbsp;Among other 
things, the bill's regulations would include:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li>No Drilling Without Demonstrated Ability to Prevent and Contain 
Leaks</li><li>Blowout Preventer Requirements</li><li>Ensuring Safe Wells and Cementing</li><li>Independent Technical Advice and Certification</li><li>Well Control and Blowout Prevention Inspectors<br /></li></ul>

								  								 
							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"We don't oppose 
offshore drilling," concluded Holstein. "But America must accelerate its
 movement toward a clean energy future by enacting a clean energy and 
climate bill into law. &nbsp;Meanwhile, the industry must act now to rebuild 
public trust and confidence in its ability to conduct its activities 
safely and responsibly, and the government must demonstrate a renewed 
commitment to safeguarding the public's natural resources and our 
economy."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><b><i>Environmental 
Defense Fund</i></b><i>, a leading national nonprofit organization, 
represents more than 700,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental 
Defense&nbsp;Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative 
private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most
 serious environmental problems. For more information, visit </i><a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='97473199';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.edf.org/"><i>www.edf.org</i></a><i>. </i></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Transportation is the Achilles&apos; Heel of Green Energy Efforts, Says ASU Expert</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/06/transportation-is-the-achilles-heel-of-green-energy-efforts-says-asu-expert.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4560</id>

    <published>2010-06-23T19:39:55Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-23T19:41:32Z</updated>

    <summary> In America&apos;s efforts to go green, our Achilles&apos; heel is transportation; cars, trucks, and buses represent 29 percent of U.S. energy use, according to Gary Dirks, director of LightWorks at Arizona State University and a renewable energy expert. Whenever...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Renewable Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[ In America's efforts to go green, our Achilles' heel is 
transportation; cars, trucks, and buses represent 29 percent of U.S. 
energy use, according to <span class="xn-person">Gary Dirks</span>, 
director of LightWorks at <span class="xn-org">Arizona State University</span>
 and a renewable energy expert.<br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Whenever U.S. officials
 talk about finding ways to end our reliance on oil, like now as a 
reaction to the massive <span class="xn-location">Gulf of Mexico</span> 
oil spill, we need to take a realistic look at how we use oil and what 
are our available alternatives, Dirks said.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>For example, in our 
energy future "nuclear, solar, hydro and wind energy all will have 
growing roles in electricity generation, whereas the importance of coal 
and oil will decline," explained Dirks. "But when we want to move a car,
 a truck or an airplane, there's really only one way to do it - get the 
stuff out of the ground. Oil remains a relatively cheap source of energy
 that is so convenient its use overrides its considerable drawbacks in 
terms of air pollution, environmental concerns and national security." </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>So what can the U.S. do
 to end its messy addiction to oil but remain a mobile society? </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"In addition to a 
long-term transportation energy plan that does not include fossil fuels,
 we need a nearer term solution that can take us from the traditional 
internal combustion vehicles to tomorrow's advanced fleet," said Dirks. 
"That future should include the Sun."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"There are techniques 
and nascent technologies in the works that will take carbon dioxide, 
water and sunlight and combine them in such a way to generate fuels for 
our cars, but today they are too expensive," Dirks said. "More research 
and development is needed to make these fuels a reality. &nbsp;That is why 
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is sponsoring an energy innovation 
Hub to make 'drop in' fuels from sunlight."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"The beauty of these 
fuels is that they don't require production of any fossil fuel, which in
 itself requires energy and generates pollution, but are made from 
completely renewable, existing and abundant components - water, carbon 
dioxide and sunlight." </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The process is similar 
to photosynthesis, by which concentrated solar energy is used in 
conjunction with carbon dioxide and water to create hydrocarbons. In 
addition to creating combustible fuels like methanol and ethanol, 
additional processing can yield more traditional fuels like gasoline, 
diesel and jet fuel. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"The fuels that result 
from these processes will look, feel and perform just like what we pump 
into our cars today. They will use existing refineries to prepare fuel 
blends and existing gas stations to deliver the fuel to today's cars," 
he added. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>But the new fuels will 
be carbon neutral and will not add to the build up of greenhouses gases 
blanketing the planet. They also will help the U.S. move from an 
unstable source of energy produced far off shore, to a form of energy 
generated on our soil. Drilling will not be needed with these fuels. 
Increased security, cleaner air and new jobs will result. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The DOE Hub, along with
 several other ambitious initiatives involving both the near-term and 
long-term future of fuels, specifically looks at processes for making 
solar liquid fuels and bringing them to market in a developmentally 
rapid, 15-year time span. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"We need investments in
 the R&amp;D phases of this technology to come not only from the 
government, but from industry too," Dirks explained. "And the new fuels 
will cost a lot more than the old fossil fuels they replace, at least 
initially. &nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		
						<p>"Even with subsidies, 
the cost difference could be dramatic," Dirks added. "<span class="xn-money">Five dollars</span> for a gallon of solar liquid fuel 
is a realistic short term target, but it could be more. So, we need to 
ask ourselves, do we want to continue with what is convenient and 
economical today or do we want to focus our efforts on what is the 
logical next step in our long-term energy future?" - SOURCE  <span class="xn-org">Arizona State University</span></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A Moral Obligation, Not a Legal Obligation, Requires the Use of U.S. Vessels in Gulf Coast Oil Spill Cleanup</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/06/a-moral-obligation-not-a-legal-obligation-requires-the-use-of-us-vessels-in-gulf-coast-oil-spill-cle.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4543</id>

    <published>2010-06-11T20:35:13Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-11T20:36:36Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Recent news stories have been erroneously reporting that foreign skimming vessels are not able to work on the BP oil spill cleanup because of the Jones Act. &nbsp;These reports are incorrect.&nbsp;The Jones Act does not apply and therefore does...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[ Recent news stories have been erroneously reporting that foreign 
skimming vessels are not able to work on the BP oil spill cleanup 
because of the Jones Act. &nbsp;These reports are incorrect.&nbsp;The Jones Act 
does not apply and therefore does not prevent foreign vessels from 
working on oil skimming operations in waters beyond the state's 
three-mile limit. &nbsp;In fact, a number of foreign vessels have been 
working at the scene for some time.&nbsp; <br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>For skimming activities
 within any state's three-mile limit, longstanding and established law 
says that any such work, including the skimming activity, must be 
performed by a U.S. vessel, if one is available. &nbsp;If a U.S. vessel is 
not available, there is a waiver process that can be used to bring in 
foreign vessels. &nbsp;We are not yet aware of any waiver request being made 
because a U.S. vessel is not available. &nbsp;The important distinction is 
that under the Jones Act, foreign vessels may be used <u>only</u> if 
U.S. vessels are not available.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Once again, it appears
 that critics of the Jones Act are distorting the facts by claiming that
 the Jones Act applies in an instance when it simply doesn't, or where 
it does, not being forthcoming with the law and the facts. &nbsp;Worse, they 
are taking advantage of this disastrous situation to undermine American 
workers for the benefit of foreign companies and foreign workers," said <span class="xn-person">Ken Wells</span>, President of the Offshore Marine 
Service Association (OMSA). &nbsp;"But even in instances where the law does 
not require the use of a U.S. vessel, BP should make every attempt to 
hire U.S. vessels and their workers. &nbsp;The entire Gulf Coast and 
surrounding areas have been hurt by the BP spill.&nbsp; The seafood and 
tourism industries have suffered. &nbsp;And it doesn't make sense now to put 
the Gulf Coast maritime industry out of work just to give jobs to a few 
foreign boats," he continued</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>OMSA, on behalf of the 
owners and operators of U.S. flag vessels that work in the offshore 
energy sector, is working diligently to make sure that the spill is 
brought under control and cleaned up as quickly as possible. &nbsp;OMSA is 
also making sure that available American vessels are put to work and, if
 a waiver is necessary, that this is accomplished quickly and 
effectively.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"We want to make 
crystal clear that in no way, shape or form are we taking any action 
that hampers the spill cleanup effort. &nbsp;However, this should not become 
an excuse for foreign companies to take advantage of this tragic 
accident for their own gain or for opponents of the law to try to 
undercut it," Wells said.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The Jones Act is the 
common name for the U.S. cabotage laws, which say that only U.S. flag 
vessels with coastwise endorsements may transport merchandise or 
passengers between points in the United States.&nbsp;&nbsp;The original cabotage 
laws trace back to the founding of our nation and have served to 
maintain a domestic shipbuilding and maritime industry throughout our 
history.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		
						<p><a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='96165504';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.offshoremarine.org/">www.offshoremarine.org</a> - SOURCE  Offshore Marine Service Association</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Winds of Change: Ohio Legislature Passes Renewable Energy Tax Reform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/06/winds-of-change-ohio-legislature-passes-renewable-energy-tax-reform.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4533</id>

    <published>2010-06-04T20:12:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-04T20:13:50Z</updated>

    <summary>A late-night vote Thursday by the Ohio House demonstrates Ohio&apos;s bipartisan commitment to bringing clean energy, job creation and greater investment in local communities vying for renewable energy projects. Sub Senate Bill 232 passed the House by a vote of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Government" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Wind Power" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="clean energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[A late-night vote Thursday by the Ohio House demonstrates <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>'s bipartisan commitment to bringing 
clean energy, job creation and greater investment in local communities 
vying for renewable energy projects.<br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Sub Senate Bill 232 
passed the House by a vote of 91-7 and the Senate concurred shortly 
after passage by a vote of 27-5 with a final reconciled bill headed to 
Gov. <span class="xn-person">Ted Strickland</span>'s desk before summer 
recess, according to the grassroots coalition Wind and Solar Jobs for <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"With this vote, <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span> public officials have positioned the 
State to create and protect thousands of local <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>
 manufacturing, construction, operations and maintenance jobs in the 
wind industry," said <span class="xn-person">Brad Lystra</span>, 
manager, economic development partnerships for the American Wind Energy 
Association.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The bipartisan effort 
and passage of Sub Senate Bill 232 was critical to bringing <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>'s tax structure for wind development 
sites in line with surrounding states as developers finalize decisions 
on which projects to prioritize to leverage expiring federal stimulus 
funding. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Lystra applauded the 
bipartisan spirit and the leadership of Sen. <span class="xn-person">Chris
 Widener</span> (R-<span class="xn-location">Springfield</span>) who 
championed Senate Bill 232, Gov. <span class="xn-person">Ted Strickland</span>,
 and Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Rep. <span class="xn-person">Tom Leston</span> (D-<span class="xn-location">Warren</span>)
 for working together to advance <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>'s
 clean energy future.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"By eliminating this 
tax disadvantage, <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span> lawmakers have 
strengthened the renewable market and secured millions in new tax 
revenue for local communities," Lystra said. "Additionally, <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>'s struggling manufacturing industry will
 get a significant boost from wind turbine component part orders and 
position itself to see even greater investments from wind and solar 
manufacturers looking to expand into new markets and supply chains."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Wind and Solar Jobs for
 <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span> is a coalition of businesses and 
organizations that support the adoption of a competitive tax structure 
for wind and solar projects in <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>. 
For more information on the coalition and the specifics of the seven 
proposed wind farms for <span class="xn-location">Ohio</span>, visit <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='95636879';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.windandsolarjobsforohio.com/">www.windandsolarjobsforohio.com</a>.
 </p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ExxonMobil Shareholders Strongly Support Disclosure of Natural Gas &apos;Fracking&apos; Risks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/05/exxonmobil-shareholders-strongly-support-disclosure-of-natural-gas-fracking-risks.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4516</id>

    <published>2010-05-26T23:04:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-26T23:06:30Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[A proposal asking ExxonMobil to disclose what it is doing to reduce risks from toxic chemicals in natural gas drilling, and consider alternatives, won support today from holders of 26.3&nbsp;percent of the company's shares - the latest indication of investors'...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Drilling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[A proposal asking ExxonMobil to disclose what it is doing to reduce 
risks from toxic chemicals in natural gas drilling, and consider 
alternatives, won support today from holders of 26.3&nbsp;percent of the 
company's shares - the latest indication of investors' concerns about 
hydraulic fracturing's threat to drinking water, public health and 
shareholder value.<br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The level of support 
was five&nbsp;times the typical level for a first-time environmental 
resolution.&nbsp;The proposal was put forth by As You Sow, a shareholder 
advocacy organization based in <span class="xn-location">San Francisco</span>,
 representing the Park Foundation of <span class="xn-location">Ithaca, 
N.Y.</span>, and the holders of 16,746 ExxonMobil shares valued at more 
than <span class="xn-money">$1.1 million</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Today's vote sent a 
strong message to ExxonMobil that shareholders are concerned about how 
it is dealing with hydraulic fracturing, especially in light of the 
expansion that will make it the nation's largest natural gas company," 
said <span class="xn-person">Michael Passoff</span>, senior program 
director of the corporate responsibility program at As You Sow.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Hydraulic fracturing, 
or "fracking," is a controversial process of injecting water, chemicals 
and particles underground to increase gas production. In response to 
reports of contaminated water supplies and intense public concern, 
tougher regulations have been introduced in <span class="xn-location">New
 York</span>, <span class="xn-location">Pennsylvania</span>, and <span class="xn-location">Colorado</span> and legislation has been introduced 
in Congress to repeal the exemption of fracking from the Safe Drinking 
Water Act.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"Fracking poses 
regulatory risks that could greatly increase operation costs, legal 
liabilities from health impacts, and reputational risk from 
growing&nbsp;public and political opposition," added Passoff. "If ExxonMobil 
truly aren't concerned about the financial ramifications of fracking, 
they're not a good bet for investors."</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>In the absence of 
meaningful disclosure by the company, shareholders took the unusual step
 of highlighting fracking risks with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission. (<a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='94940484';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/9TFOjP"><b>http://bit.ly/9TFOjP</b></a>).
 For background on the significance of today's shareholder vote, see <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='94940484';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://jm.ly/EGys66"><b>http://jm.ly/EGys66</b></a>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"The Gulf oil spill is a
 powerful example of how oil and gas drilling can devastate the 
environment," said <span class="xn-person">Jon Jensen</span>, executive 
director of the Park Foundation. "This is a good first step in 
responsibly seeking energy in a way that protects the environment, human
 health, and the welfare of the company."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Westinghouse and EnergyLab Collaborate on Nuclear Conference in Italy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/05/westinghouse-and-energylab-collaborate-on-nuclear-conference-in-italy.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4503</id>

    <published>2010-05-14T20:43:19Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-14T20:44:50Z</updated>

    <summary>Westinghouse Electric Company LLC co-hosted a conference on the current and future potential of nuclear energy in Italy under the ongoing co-operation with the Italian energy foundation EnergyLab. Westinghouse sponsored the event, titled &quot;AP1000™ is on schedule for 2013,&quot; which...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Nuclear Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company LLC co-hosted a conference on the 
current and future potential of nuclear energy in <span class="xn-location">Italy</span> under the ongoing co-operation with the
 Italian energy foundation EnergyLab. Westinghouse sponsored the event, 
titled "AP1000™ is on schedule for 2013," which was held at the Chamber 
of Deputies in <span class="xn-location">Rome</span>.<br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The event highlighted 
the successes of current AP1000 projects, principally that all four 
AP1000 plants are on schedule in <span class="xn-location">China</span> 
with the first commercial operation date due in 2013. The event also 
discussed Westinghouse's 10 AP1000 plants under contract with Chinese 
and US customers and how Italian industry is playing a large role in the
 success of current AP1000 projects. Presentations were made by 
representatives of major Italian Industries describing their 
participation with Westinghouse on current AP1000 projects.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><span class="xn-person">Gary
 Shuttleworth</span>, Director of International Business Development, 
says that Westinghouse continues it commitment in support of the Italian
 nuclear program. &nbsp;"Westinghouse welcomes the opportunity to collaborate
 with EnergyLab in promoting nuclear energy in <span class="xn-location">Italy</span>.
 &nbsp;We firmly believe that the Westinghouse AP1000™ plant is the solution 
for providing the people of <span class="xn-location">Italy</span> with 
safe, secure and economically responsible energy, and we look forward to
 taking part in the overall discussion relative to <span class="xn-location">Italy</span>'s energy needs." &nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The AP1000 plant design
 is certified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the only 
Generation III+ reactor to receive such certification. &nbsp;Additionally, 
the European Utility Requirements (EUR) organization certified that the 
AP1000 plant is compliant with European Utility Requirements, confirming
 that it can be successfully deployed in <span class="xn-location">Europe</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The Westinghouse AP1000
 plant offers additional benefits through its simplified modular 
construction methods and greater ability to involve Italian industry 
through localization of manufacturing and construction, known as the Buy
 Where We Build™ program. &nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>In addition to four 
AP1000 plants that the Westinghouse/Shaw Consortium is providing in <span class="xn-location">China</span>, Westinghouse and its AP1000 plant 
have been identified as the supplier and technology of choice for no 
less than 14 plants that have been announced in <span class="xn-location">the United States</span>, including six for which 
engineering, procurement and construction contracts have been signed. 
Additionally, Westinghouse and <span class="xn-location">China</span> 
are currently in discussion on plans for additional AP1000 plants to be 
sited inland of <span class="xn-location">China</span>'s coastal areas.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Westinghouse believes 
the AP1000 design is ideally suited for the worldwide nuclear power 
marketplace. The AP1000 nuclear power plant is:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li>Based on standard Westinghouse 
pressurized water reactor (PWR) technology that has achieved more than 
2,500 reactor years of highly successful operation </li><li>An 1100MWe 
design that is ideal for providing baseload generating capacity and fits
 within the constraints of the Italian electrical grid</li><li>Modular 
in design, promoting ready standardization and high construction quality
 </li><li>Economical to construct and maintain (less concrete and steel 
and fewer components and systems mean there is less to install, inspect 
and maintain)</li><li>Designed to promote ease of operation (features 
most advanced instrumentation and control systems (I&amp;C) in the 
industry)</li></ul><br />
								  								 
							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>For more information 
about the Westinghouse AP1000 plant, visit its Web site at <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='93797854';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.ap1000.westinghousenuclear.com/">www.ap1000.westinghousenuclear.com</a>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>EnergyLab, founded in 
2007, is a cross-organizational collaboration of government and academic
 institutions, including the Lombardia regional government, AEM 
Foundation and the Edison Foundation, the municipality of <span class="xn-location">Milan</span>, the University of <span class="xn-location">Milan</span>, the University of Milan-Bicocca, <span class="xn-org">the Catholic University</span>, Milan Polytechnic, <span class="xn-org">Bocconi University</span> and the research center ERSE.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Westinghouse Electric 
Company, a group company of Toshiba Corporation (TKY: 6502), is the 
world's pioneering nuclear energy company and is a leading supplier of 
nuclear plant products and technologies to utilities throughout the 
world.&nbsp; Westinghouse supplied the world's first PWR in 1957 in <span class="xn-location">Shippingport, Pa.</span> &nbsp;Today, Westinghouse 
technology is the basis for approximately one-half of the world's 
operating nuclear plants, including 60 percent of those in <span class="xn-location">the United States</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		
						<p>SOURCE  Westinghouse Electric Company LLC</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Attorney General Holder Dispatches Justice Department Team to Monitor British Petroleum Oil Spill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/04/attorney-general-holder-dispatches-justice-department-team-to-monitor-british-petroleum-oil-spill.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4490</id>

    <published>2010-04-30T21:47:38Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-30T21:49:36Z</updated>

    <summary>Attorney General Eric Holder announced today that he is dispatching a team of attorneys from multiple divisions within the Justice Department to New Orleans to meet with the U.S. Attorney and response teams and to monitor the oil spill in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[Attorney General <span class="xn-person">Eric Holder</span> announced
 today that he is dispatching a team of attorneys from multiple 
divisions within the Justice Department to <span class="xn-location">New
 Orleans</span> to meet with the U.S. Attorney and response teams and to
 monitor the oil spill in the <span class="xn-location">Gulf of Mexico</span>.<br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"The British Petroleum 
oil spill has already cost lives and created a major environmental 
incident," said Attorney General Holder. "The Justice Department stands 
ready to make available every resource at our disposal to vigorously 
enforce the laws that protect the people who work and reside near the 
Gulf, the wildlife, the environment and the American taxpayers." </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The team will be led by
 <span class="xn-person">Ignacia S. Moreno</span>, Assistant Attorney 
General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, and <span class="xn-person">Tony West</span>, Assistant Attorney General for the 
Civil Division, and will include relevant <span class="xn-location">United
 States</span> Attorneys. The combined group from the Department plans 
to make a site visit and meet with representatives from federal agencies
 working on the response. </p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>A coordinated response 
continues with a comprehensive oil well intervention and spill-response 
plan following the <span class="xn-chron">April 22, 2010</span> sinking 
of the Transocean Deepwater Horizon drilling rig 130 miles southeast of <span class="xn-location">New Orleans</span>. More than 1,000 personnel from 
federal, state and local agencies are involved in the response effort 
both on and offshore, with additional resources being mobilized as 
needed.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		
						<p>SOURCE  U.S. Department of Justice</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Siemens to Supply Wind Turbines for E.ON&apos;s Papalote Creek II Wind Farm in Texas, USA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/04/siemens-to-supply-wind-turbines-for-eons-papalote-creek-ii-wind-farm-in-texas-usa.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4473</id>

    <published>2010-04-21T14:53:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-21T14:55:41Z</updated>

    <summary> E.ON has placed an order with Siemens Energy for the supply of 87 2.3-MW SWT-2.3-101 wind turbines for the Papalote Creek II wind power plant in San Patricio County, Texas. With a total installed rated capacity of more than...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Alternative Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Wind Power" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="clean energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[ <b>E.ON has placed an order with Siemens Energy for the supply of 87
 2.3-MW SWT-2.3-101 wind turbines for the Papalote Creek II wind power 
plant in <span class="xn-location">San Patricio County, Texas</span>. 
With a total i</b><b>n</b><b>stalled rated capacity of more than 200 
megawatts (MW), the Papalote Creek II wind farm is expected to provide 
clean power to approximately 60,000 households.</b><br /><br />

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"With this new project,
 E.ON and Siemens continue their great partnership in the wind power 
business," said <span class="xn-person">Jan Kjaersgaard</span>, vice 
president and general manager of Siemens Energy's Wind Power Americas 
business. Siemens is already one of the top three wind turbine suppliers
 in the U.S. According to the American Wind Energy Association's 
year-end 2009 market report, Siemens installed more than 1,160 MW out of
 the more than 10,000 MW installed total in the U.S. in 2009.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>"We are delighted to 
partner with Siemens in the next phase of our Papalote Creek II wind 
farm in south <span class="xn-location">Texas</span>," said <span class="xn-person">Steve Trenholm</span>, CEO, E.ON Climate &amp; 
Renewables North America. "This project will create more than 300 
temporary jobs and provide an investment of more than <span class="xn-money">$300 million</span> to the local tax base. E.ON is 
pleased to make this investment and help further the growth of the U.S. 
renewables market." &nbsp;</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>E.ON and Siemens have 
partnered on several U.S. wind farm projects in the past. Siemens 
supplied 54 2.3-MW units for E.ON's <span class="xn-person">Forest Creek</span>
 wind farm near <span class="xn-location">Big Spring, Texas</span>, in 
2006 and 55 2.3-MW wind turbines for the Champion wind farm in <span class="xn-location">Nolan County, Texas</span>, in 2007.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The Siemens scope of 
supply for the Papalote Creek II wind power plant includes delivery and 
transportation of the 87 SWT-2.3-101 wind turbines with a rated capacity
 of 2.3 MW each. With a diameter of 101 meters, the rotor of the new 
SWT-2.3-101 has a swept area of 8,000 square meters, which equals 
one-and-a-half football fields. Delivery is expected to begin in <span class="xn-chron">May 2010</span> and the wind farm is expected to be 
commissioned in the fall of 2010. Siemens also will provide service and 
maintenance for two years.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>To better meet the 
increasing demand for clean energy in the Americas, Siemens is currently
 constructing its wind turbine assembly facility in <span class="xn-location">Hutchinson, Kansas</span>, which is scheduled to 
become operational in <span class="xn-chron">December 2010</span>. The 
300,000-square-foot wind turbine nacelle facility is expected to employ 
up to approximately 400 "green-collar" employees. Siemens also recently 
expanded its 600,000-square-foot blade manufacturing facilities in <span class="xn-location">Fort Madison, Iowa</span>, which it opened in 2007.
 The blades for the Papalote Creek II wind power plant will be 
manufactured in <span class="xn-location">Fort Madison, Iowa</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Wind power is part of 
Siemens' Environmental Portfolio. In fiscal 2009, revenue from the 
Portfolio totaled approximately <span class="xn-money">EUR23 billion</span>,
 making Siemens the world's largest supplier of environmentally friendly
 technologies. In the same period, the company's products and solutions 
enabled customers to reduce their CO2 emissions by 210 million tons. 
This amount equals the combined annual CO2 emissions of <span class="xn-location">New York</span>, <span class="xn-location">Tokyo</span>,
 <span class="xn-location">London</span> and <span class="xn-location">Berlin</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The <b>Siemens Energy 
Sector</b> is the world's leading supplier of a complete spectrum of 
products, services and solutions for the generation, transmission and 
distribution of power and for the extraction, conversion and transport 
of oil and gas. In fiscal 2009 (ended <span class="xn-chron">September 
30</span>), the Energy Sector had revenues of approximately <span class="xn-money">EUR25.8 billion</span> and received new orders totaling
 approximately <span class="xn-money">EUR30 billion</span> and posted a 
profit of <span class="xn-money">EUR3.3 billion</span>. On <span class="xn-chron">September 30, 2009</span>, the Energy Sector had a work
 force of approximately 85,100. Further information is available at: <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='91704179';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.siemens.com/energy">www.siemens.com/energy</a>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><b>E.ON Climate &amp; 
Renewables (EC&amp;R)</b> is responsible for the E.ON group's renewable 
energy and environmental protection activities around the world. Tapping
 renewable energy sources offers enormous alternatives, both from a 
business perspective and for the environment. E.ON Climate &amp; 
Renewables will be investing <span class="xn-money">EUR8 billion</span> 
in renewable energy and environmental protection projects from 2007 - 
2011 to expand the share of renewable energy in E.ON's portfolio for the
 long term. E.ON has thus taken a leading role in developing renewable 
energy sources worldwide. For more information, please visit <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='91704179';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.eon.com/renewables">www.eon.com/renewables</a>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>This press release may 
contain forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and 
forecasts made by E.ON Group management and other information currently 
available to E.ON. Various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and 
other factors could lead to material differences between the actual 
future results, financial situation, development or performance of the 
company and the estimates given here. <span class="xn-person">E.ON AG</span>
 does not intend, and does not assume any liability whatsoever, to 
update these forward-looking statements or to conform them to future 
events or developments.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   																		
						<p>SOURCE  Siemens Energy, Inc.</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>IEEE Green Technologies Conference to Highlight Benefits of Renewable Energy Technologies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/04/ieee-green-technologies-conference-to-highlight-benefits-of-renewable-energy-technologies.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4463</id>

    <published>2010-04-14T20:38:52Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-14T20:42:29Z</updated>

    <summary>According to the Energy Information Administration, buildings already consume a third of energy worldwide, and world energy consumption is predicted to grow 60 percent by 2030. To increase energy efficiency and reduce environmental impact, many building teams now incorporate renewable...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Alternative Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Renewable Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[According to the Energy Information Administration, buildings already
 consume a third of energy worldwide, and world energy consumption is 
predicted to grow 60 percent by 2030.

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>To increase energy 
efficiency and reduce environmental impact, many building teams now 
incorporate renewable energy technologies into new construction and 
renovation projects.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Renewable energy 
technologies capture, store and deliver power derived from renewable 
resources, including sun, wind, water, the earth's core and plant 
matter. Because they do not depend on finite resources, renewable 
energies can increase stability in the power grid. Plus, there are state
 government incentives available to help fund many renewable 
installations.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>At the IEEE (Institute 
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.) Green Technologies 
Conference, <b><span class="xn-person">Jim Knutson</span>, comprehensive
 solutions director</b> at <b>Trane</b>, will discuss emerging energy 
tools and technologies for high-performance buildings, their application
 and results. Knutson will also cover design stage tools and those 
specific to building construction, performance, operation and 
renovation. These will include:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li>Energy modeling and analysis</li><li>Solar/photovoltaic,
 geothermal, co-generation and thermal storage</li><li>Infrared 
thermography, ultrasonic analysis and vibration transducers</li></ul><br />
								  								 
							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Conference attendees 
will learn the benefits of these technologies and how they can be used 
to increase operational efficiency and sustainability while reducing 
energy consumption.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><u><b>Details of this 
presentation:</b></u></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>When: <span class="xn-chron">Friday, April 16</span> at <span class="xn-chron">11 
a.m.</span> (Conference is <span class="xn-chron">April 15-16</span>)</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Where: Mustang 6 room 
in Gaylord Texas Resort and Convention Center, <span class="xn-location">Grapevine,
 Texas</span></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Conference Web site: <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='90827894';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.ieeegreentech.org/">http://www.ieeegreentech.org/</a></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The second annual IEEE 
Green Technologies Conference will feature a variety of papers, 
presentations and technical seminars on current and emerging topics 
related specifically to the development and use of green technologies.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p><b><span class="xn-person">Jim Knutson</span></b>, director of comprehensive 
solutions for Trane, leads a <span class="xn-location">Denver, Colo.</span>-based
 team in serving new construction and retrofit customers in six states: <span class="xn-location">Colorado</span>, <span class="xn-location">Nevada</span>,
 <span class="xn-location">Montana</span>, <span class="xn-location">Utah</span>,
 <span class="xn-location">Wyoming</span> and <span class="xn-location">New
 Mexico</span>. Knutson has over 27 years of experience providing energy
 efficiency and contracting solutions for federal, state and local 
government, K-12/higher education, commercial and industrial clients.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Knutson is a current 
board member of the Energy Efficient Business Coalition and a member of 
the Energy Services Coalition, Association of Energy Engineers and the 
Cogeneration &amp; On-Site Power Association. He played a key role in 
drafting energy efficiency legislation in 10 states over the past 15 
years. He also assisted in the development of the energy performance 
contracting M&amp;V protocol used now as the standard in many states. He
 has a bachelor of arts in Business Administration from <span class="xn-org">Concordia College in Moorhead, Minn.</span></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Trane, a business of <span class="xn-person">Ingersoll Rand</span> - the world leader in creating 
and sustaining safe, comfortable and energy efficient environments - 
improves the performance of homes and buildings around the world. Trane 
solutions optimize indoor environments with a broad portfolio of energy 
efficient heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, building 
and contracting services, parts support and advanced controls for homes 
and commercial buildings.&nbsp; For more information, visit <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='90827894';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.trane.com/">www.Trane.com</a>.</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>IEER: French-Style Nuclear Reprocessing Will Not Solve U.S. Nuclear Waste Problems</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/04/ieer-french-style-nuclear-reprocessing-will-not-solve-us-nuclear-waste-problems.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4443</id>

    <published>2010-04-08T18:36:26Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-08T18:37:32Z</updated>

    <summary>Contrary to some prevailing opinion, reprocessing would not eliminate the need for a deep geologic disposal program to replace Yucca Mountain. It aggravates waste, proliferation, and cost problems. The volume of waste to be disposed of in deep geologic repository...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Nuclear Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[Contrary to some prevailing opinion, reprocessing would not eliminate
 the need for a deep geologic disposal program to replace Yucca 
Mountain. It aggravates waste, proliferation, and cost problems. The 
volume of waste to be disposed of in deep geologic repository is 
increased about six times on a life-cycle basis in the French approach 
compared to the once-through no-reprocessing approach of <span class="xn-location">the United States</span>. 

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>A new report by the 
Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER), a nonprofit 
scientific research group, shows that <span class="xn-location">France</span>
 uses less than 1 percent of the natural uranium resource, contrary to 
an impression among some policy makers. The report has several 
recommendations for President Obama's Blue Ribbon Commission on 
America's Nuclear Future, which was created to address U.S. nuclear 
waste issues after the administration's cancellation of the Yucca 
Mountain program.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>IEER President Dr. <span class="xn-person">Arjun Makhijani</span>, the author of the report: <b>"In
 recent years, a 'French fever' has gripped the promoters of nuclear 
power in <span class="xn-location">the United States</span>. Praise of <span class="xn-location">France</span>'s management of spent fuel by 
reprocessing, including its use of the extracted plutonium as fuel in 
its nuclear power reactors, is now routinely heard. But it is a fantasy 
on the scale of the 1950s "too cheap to meter" mythology about nuclear 
power to imagine that 90 or 95 percent of the "energy value" of U.S. 
spent fuel can be extracted by reprocessing."</b></p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Key IEER report 
findings include the following:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li><i>On a life-cycle basis, French-style
 reprocessing and recycle increases the volume of waste that would have 
to disposed of in a geologic repository. </i>Reprocessing results in 
high-level radioactive waste and<i> </i>large volumes of Greater than 
Class C waste, both of which must be managed by deep geologic<i> </i>disposal.
 Their combined volume on a life-cycle basis is estimated to be about 
six times more than<i> </i>the no-reprocessing approach that is current 
U.S. policy, according to Department of Energy<i> </i>estimates. 
Low-level waste volume and waste transportation shipments are also 
estimated to increase several-fold.</li><li><i><span class="xn-location">France</span>
 spends about <span class="xn-money">two cents</span> per kilowatt-hour 
more for electricity generated from reprocessed plutonium compared to 
that generated from fresh uranium fuel</i>.</li><li><i>Attempting to 
combined reprocessing with breeder reactors to convert uranium in U.S. 
spent fuel in plutonium will create intolerable costs and risks. </i>Reprocessing
 plus breeder reactors are much more<i> </i>expensive than light water 
reactors today, which are themselves expensive. Such a system is<i> </i>required
 to convert most of the uranium in spent fuel into a reactor fuel. Even a
 single penny in<i> </i>excess generation cost per kilowatt-hour in a 
breeder reactor-reprocessing system would lead to an<i> </i>added <span class="xn-money">$8 trillion</span> in costs to convert nearly all of 
the uranium in the 100,000 metric tons of U.S. spent<i> </i>into usable 
fuel. It would take hundreds of years to accomplish the task and require
 separation of<i> </i>tens of thousands of bombs equivalent of fissile 
material each year. The proliferation risks will be far<i> </i>greater 
than today.</li><li><i>Adoption of French-style reprocessing program 
would not eliminate the need for a deep geologic repository. </i>Even 
complete fissioning of all actinides - an unrealistic proposition - will
 leave behind<i> </i>large amounts of very long-lived fission and 
activation products like iodine-129, cesium-135, and<i> </i>chlorine-36 
that will pose risks far into the future -- much beyond the 24,100-year 
half-life of<i> </i>plutonium-239. In fact, <span class="xn-location">France</span>
 needs a geologic repository and opposition to one has been intense<i> </i>there.
 The French appear to dislike nuclear waste in their backyards as much 
as people in the United<i> </i>States.</li><li><i>Proliferation risks 
are inherently part of the French (and any other) approach to 
reprocessing. </i>Even advanced reprocessing technologies will not 
significantly reduce proliferation risks. For instance a study authored 
by scientists from DOE laboratories, including Los Alamos and Sandia, 
concluded that it would take only a few days or a few weeks for 
proliferant country to make material for nuclear bombs once it had 
reprocessing plants. It found that new technologies, including 
electrometallurgical processing, resulted in "only a modest improvement 
in reducing proliferation risk over existing PUREX technologies and 
these modest improvements apply primarily for non-state actors." The 
IEER report concluded that electrometallurgical increases risks in other
 ways. For instance, it is far less difficult to conceal a plant than 
the present PUREX technology.</li></ul><br />
								  								 
							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Other key findings 
include the following:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li><i>Six decades of sodium cooled 
breeder reactor development has so far resulted in failure. </i>Historical
 experience indicates no learning curve for the sodium cooled fast 
breeder reactor, which is the breeder technology that has received the 
most development. In fact, the two most recent large scale demonstration
 reactors, Superphénix in <span class="xn-location">France</span> and 
Monju in <span class="xn-location">Japan</span>, have been failures. 
Superphénix had a cumulative capacity factor of less than 8 percent 
before it was shut. Monju has been closed for almost 15 years, following
 a sodium fire, and has not generated a significant amount of 
electricity. Sodium cooled breeder reactors are not commercial today 
despite global expenditures on the order of <span class="xn-money">$100 
billion</span> over six decades. They face a host of safety, 
proliferation and cost hurdles to overcome, some arising from the fact 
that they use liquid sodium for cooling. They are unlikely to be 
commercial in the near future. For instance, <span class="xn-location">Japan</span>'s
 estimated date for commercialization of the sodium cooled fast breeder 
is 2050.</li><li><i>Storage of liquid high-level wastes creates some 
risk of catastrophic releases of radioactivity. </i>For instance, the 
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority has estimated that a severe 
accident at the liquid waste storage facility in Sellafield, <span class="xn-location">Britain</span>, could result in cesium-137 
contamination between 10 percent and 5,000 percent of that created in <span class="xn-location">Norway</span> by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor
 accident, which is the worst commercial accident to date, by far. A 
catastrophic release of radioactivity from a military high-level waste 
tank occurred in the <span class="xn-location">Soviet Union</span> in 
1957.</li><li><i>Using more than 1 percent of the uranium resource in a 
light water reactor system is technically impossible even with 
reprocessing and re-enrichment. </i>In light water reactor systems, 
almost all the uranium resource winds up as depleted uranium or in spent
 fuel. Even with repeated reprocessing and re-enrichment, use of the 
natural uranium resource cannot be increased to more than 1 percent in 
such a system. A corollary is that the use of 90 to 95 percent of the 
uranium resource or of the material in the spent fuel is impossible in a
 light water reactor system even with reprocessing.</li></ul><br />
								  								 
							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>These are physical 
constraints that go with the system and also apply to <span class="xn-location">France</span>'s system.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The IEER report also 
sets out a number of recommendations for the Blue Ribbon Commission on</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>America's Nuclear 
Future appointed by Energy Secretary <span class="xn-person">Steven Chu</span>:</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 							 								  									   <ul class="discStyle" type="disc"><li>Spent fuel from existing reactors 
should be slated for direct geologic disposal without reprocessing of 
any kind; a suitable path for a scientifically sound program should be 
set forth.</li><li>In the interim, spent fuel should be stored on site 
as safely as possible - in low density configurations while in pools and
 in hardened storage when moved to dry casks.</li><li>Breeder reactors 
and reprocessing are not commercial after six decades of development of 
sodium cooled breeder reactors, and enormous expenditures. Given the 
long time frame for commercialization estimated even by some promoters, 
the proliferation risks, and efforts already made, it does not appear to
 be a good investment to spend more R&amp;D money in that direction. 
Rather energy supply R&amp;D resources should be focused on development 
and deployment of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency.</li><li>The
 Commission should request the French company AREVA and/or the French 
government to supply it with data on the present use of the natural 
uranium resource purchased for French nuclear reactors, including, 
specifically, the increases in fission fraction that have actually been 
achieved by reprocessing and recycling.</li><li>The Commission should 
also request official data on Greater than Class C waste equivalent 
expected to be generated on a life-cycle basis in <span class="xn-location">France</span>, and the total volumes and heat 
generation of packaged waste expected to be disposed of in a deep 
geologic repository, including estimates of decommissioning waste.</li><li>The
 Commission should investigate the public support or lack thereof for 
repository programs in <span class="xn-location">France</span> and <span class="xn-location">Britain</span>, the countries with the longest 
history of commercial spent fuel reprocessing.</li><li>The Commission 
should make the same requests regarding the British reprocessing 
program.</li><li>Official analyses of the mechanisms, probability, and 
consequences of large accidental releases of radioactivity to the 
atmosphere from liquid high-level waste storage in tanks should be 
requested from the French and British governments.</li></ul> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Western Wind Energy Corp announces a 10% increase in electricity production for the year ended December 31, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/04/western-wind-energy-corp-announces-a-10-increase-in-electricity-production-for-the-year-ended-decemb.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4431</id>

    <published>2010-04-01T19:11:01Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-01T19:11:27Z</updated>

    <summary>Western Wind Energy Corp. (&quot;Western Wind&quot; or the &quot;Company&quot;) announced today its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009. Highlights for the Year: - Raised $6.3 million in new equity. - Received zoning approval for its 120MW Windstar...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Alternative Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Wind Power" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[Western Wind Energy Corp. ("Western Wind" or the "Company") announced
 today its financial results for the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December
 31, 2009</span>.


							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Highlights for the 
Year:</p>

<pre>    -   Raised $6.3 million in new equity.<br />    -   Received zoning approval for its 120MW Windstar wind energy project.<br />    -   Engaged a senior lender to provide $200m in financing for Windstar<br />        subject to final lender approval.<br />    -   Entered into a turbine reservation order for Windstar with a leading<br />        turbine supplier.<br />    -   Received a 24 year extension of the Mesa land lease and the right to<br />        repower and expand.<br />    -   Secured an 11MW PPA for a combined wind and solar project in Arizona.<br />    -   Signed an amendment to the Windstar PPA that updates the terms to<br />        reflect the current market conditions and completion schedule.<br />    -   Secured additional prime wind and solar resource land in Tehachapi,<br />        California.<br /></pre>


							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Subsequent to the year 
end:</p>

<pre>    -   Closed two loan agreements with institutional investors for a total<br />        of $2.5 million.<br />    -   Selected a Institutionally recognized EPC - BOP contractor for<br />        Windstar<br />    -   Commenced Engineering, design and preliminary construction on<br />        Windstar<br /></pre>


							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>2009 FINANCIAL RESULTS</p>


							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The Company is pleased 
to announce a 10% increase in electricity production to 58,859 MWh for 
the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2009</span> compared 
to 53,579 MWh for the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 
2008</span>. However lower natural gas prices led to a decrease in the 
average Short Run Avoided Cost electricity selling prices which resulted
 in revenues decreasing 45% to <span class="xn-money">$2,798,496</span> 
compared to <span class="xn-money">$5,116,652</span> for the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2009</span>. Net loss from continuing 
operations increased from <span class="xn-money">$4,993,000</span>, or <span class="xn-money">fifteen cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.15)</span>
 per share, for the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2008</span>
 to a net loss of <span class="xn-money">$5,023,162</span>, or twelve <span class="xn-money">three cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.12)</span>
 per share. The slight increase in net loss from continuing operations 
for the period was due to lower revenues and no interest recovery in 
2009, which were mostly offset by a <span class="xn-money">$1,400,182</span>
 (34%) decrease in general and administration costs and decreases in 
foreign exchange losses and amortization. Net loss for the year was <span class="xn-money">$5,023,162</span>, or <span class="xn-money">twelve 
cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.12)</span> per share, compared 
to a net loss of <span class="xn-money">$2,269,275</span>, or <span class="xn-money">seven cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.07)</span>
 per share, for the prior year. Net loss last year included income from 
discontinued operations of <span class="xn-money">$2,724,047</span> 
primarily relating to a one-time <span class="xn-money">US$3,000,000</span>
 reduction of the loan principal due to the Mesa loan repayment before 
the agreed upon repayment date of <span class="xn-chron">June 24, 2008</span>.
 The net gain recorded was <span class="xn-money">$2,900,000</span> 
after taking into account a Mesa Loan extension fee of <span class="xn-money">$100,000</span>.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Although electricity 
production for the three months ended <span class="xn-chron">December 
31, 2009</span> was similar to the same period in the prior year, the 
decrease in average Short Run Avoided Cost electricity selling prices 
resulted in revenues decreasing 53% to <span class="xn-money">$321,952</span>
 from <span class="xn-money">$687,666</span> for the three months ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2008</span>. Despite the drop in 
revenues, net loss for the three months ended <span class="xn-chron">December
 31, 2009</span> improved 33% to <span class="xn-money">$1,512,001</span>
 or <span class="xn-money">two cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.02)</span>
 per share compared to a net loss of <span class="xn-money">$2,251,537</span>
 or <span class="xn-money">seven cents</span> <span class="xn-money">($0.07)</span>
 per share for the comparable period in 2008 due primarily to a 
reduction in amortization, stock based compensation and travel expenses.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The Company's financial
 position continued to strengthen as cash increased from <span class="xn-money">$1,817,371</span> as at <span class="xn-chron">December
 31, 2008</span> to <span class="xn-money">$1,882,152</span> as at <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2009</span>. Shareholders equity improved
 11% from <span class="xn-money">$22,442,493</span> last year to <span class="xn-money">$24,843,162</span> primarily as a result of <span class="xn-money">$6.3 million</span> of new equity from the issue of 
shares and warrants.</p>

							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>The information in this
 news release should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated 
Financial Statements for the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 
31, 2009</span>, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted
 accounting principles, and the Management Discussion and Analysis for 
the year ended <span class="xn-chron">December 31, 2009</span>. The 
financial statements and MD&amp;A will be available at the Company's 
website at <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='89695567';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.westernwindenergy.com/">www.westernwindenergy.com</a>
 and at <a onclick="var 
s=s_gi(s_account);s.linkTrackVars='prop5,eVar3,prop15';s.prop5='External
 
Link';s.eVar3=s.prop5;s.prop15='89695567';s.tl(this,'o','ExternalLink');" target="_blank" href="http://www.sedar.com/">www.sedar.com</a>.</p>


							 				   			  		 		
		 		 
			  				   							 							 							 								  <p>Western Wind is a 
vertically integrated renewable energy electrical production company 
that currently owns over 500 wind turbines with 34.5 MW of rated 
capacity and a further 131MW of expansion power purchase agreements in 
the States of <span class="xn-location">California</span> and <span class="xn-location">Arizona</span>. Western Wind further owns additional
 development assets for both Solar and Wind Energy in <span class="xn-location">California</span>, <span class="xn-location">Arizona</span>,
 <span class="xn-location">Ontario, Canada</span> and a development team
 in the Commonwealth of <span class="xn-location">Puerto Rico</span>. 
Western Wind is in the business of owning and acquiring land sites and 
technology for the production of electricity from wind and solar energy.
 Management of Western Wind Energy includes individuals involved in the 
operations and ownership of utility scale wind energy facilities in <span class="xn-location">California</span> since 1981.</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Vermont Town Halls Went 14-1 for Closure of Vermont Yankee Reactor, as Anticipated by Civil Society Institute Opinion Survey</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/03/vermont-town-halls-went-14-1-for-closure-of-vermont-yankee-reactor-as-anticipated-by-civil-society-i.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4407</id>

    <published>2010-03-04T21:03:29Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-04T21:09:09Z</updated>

    <summary>As predicted based on a survey conducted by Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) for the nonpartisan and nonprofit Civil Society Institute, the vast majority of Vermont Town Halls deliberating this week the fate of the Vermont Yankee came out in support...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Nuclear Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As predicted based on a survey conducted by Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) for the nonpartisan and nonprofit Civil Society Institute, the vast majority of Vermont Town Halls deliberating this week the fate of the Vermont Yankee came out in support of closure of the controversial nuclear reactor by 2012. &nbsp;The final tally of Town Halls in <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> opposing the relicensing of Vermont Yankee was 14-1.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>The town of <span class="xn-location">Rockingham</span> was alone in passing a pro-Vermont Yankee resolution and, even then, only by a margin of three votes, according to reports. &nbsp;Towns voting in favor of shutting down Vermont Yankee were: &nbsp;Thetford, <span class="xn-location">Bristol</span>, <span class="xn-location">Fayston</span>, <span class="xn-location">Brookfield</span>, <span class="xn-location">Montgomery</span>, <span class="xn-location">Woodstock</span>, <span class="xn-location">Moretown</span>, <span class="xn-location">Waitsfield</span>, <span class="xn-location">Danville</span>, <span class="xn-location">Cabot</span>, <span class="xn-location">Huntington</span>, <span class="xn-location">Sharon</span> and <span class="xn-location">Jamaica</span>. &nbsp;Additionally, <span class="xn-location">Cambridge</span> elected to table the issue.</p>
<p><span class="xn-person">Pam Solo</span>, founder and president, Civil Society Institute, said: &nbsp;<b>"Our survey pointed to the likelihood that the Vermont Town Halls would come out along the lines of the earlier <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> Senate vote to close Vermont Yankee by 2012. &nbsp;With literally dozens of other reactors plagued with similar tritium leaks, we see a clear message here for a U.S. nuclear power industry: &nbsp; You can't sell Americans on the notion that you are providing 'clean and safe' power at the same time that you are leaking a radioactive substance into wells and other bodies of water. &nbsp;Citizens in other states may not be able to intervene as directly in reactor issues as Vermonters can, but the Town Hall votes and our survey findings suggest that Americans are unlikely to remain silent about tritium leaks and other legitimate safety concerns."</b></p>
<p>The Civil Society Institute's<b> </b>scientific survey of 802 adult <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents was based on Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) polling that took place <span class="xn-chron">February 19-22nd</span> immediately before the <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> Senate vote on Vermont Yankee relicensing. &nbsp; CSI believes that the findings resonate nationally in that a main driver of deteriorating public support for Vermont Yankee centered on the leaking of radioactive tritium, a problem that also is playing out at 27 or more of the nation's 104 reactors across 31 states.</p>
<p>Key survey findings reported by Opinion Research Corporation included the following:</p>
<ul class="discStyle" type="disc">
<li>About two thirds of <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents (65 percent) say "reports about Vermont Yankee leaking radioactive tritium into testing wells and surrounding water" make them "more likely to support the 2012 closure of the reactor."&nbsp; That includes 44 percent of Republicans, 80 percent of Democrats and 60 percent of Independents. &nbsp; </li>
<li>Of those <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents who heard about the radioactive tritium leak at Vermont Yankee, nearly four in five (79 percent) said they are concerned about it, including more than half (52 percent) who are "very concerned."&nbsp; Only about one in five (21 percent) of this group said that they were not concerned, with just 6 percent saying they were "not concerned at all."&nbsp; Even when the 20 percent of state residents who have not heard about the tritium leak are added, the percentage of all state residents who are concerned about the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee still accounts for 63 percent of the state's adult population. &nbsp;</li>
<li>Overall,&nbsp;71 percent of state residents are "less supportive now of Vermont Yankee, the nuclear reactor, than [they] were six months ago."&nbsp; That includes 57 percent of Republicans, 82 percent of Democrats and two thirds of Independents. &nbsp;</li>
<li>Given a choice, fewer than one in 10 <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents (9 percent) would ask their power company to use nuclear energy to power their homes, compared to 71 percent who selected "wind, solar and other clean-energy technologies." </li>
<li>The fact that Entergy has been unable to find the source of the tritium leaks makes more than three out of four <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents (76 percent) "less confident in the company's ability to safely manage a nuclear reactor".</li>
<li>About half of <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents (49 percent) see nuclear power as a "power source of yesterday," compared to compared to 94 percent for solar, 92 percent for wind and 78 percent for hydroelectric as "power sources of tomorrow" that should play a bigger, rather than smaller, role in the U.S. energy supply picture. &nbsp;</li>
<li>Nine out of 10 <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents (89 percent) say that Entergy -- not <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> taxpayers -- "should have to foot the bill for decommissioning Vermont Yankee."&nbsp; That includes 83 percent of Republicans, 94 percent of Democrats and 90 percent of Independents.</li>
<li>68 percent of <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents would support closure of Vermont Yankee in 2012 "assuming that a combination of increased energy efficiency, clean energy, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar and natural gas could be used to offset the electricity from the reactor."&nbsp; That includes 48 percent of Republicans, 82 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of Independents. &nbsp; </li>
<li>71 percent of <span class="xn-location">Vermont</span> residents would support closure of Vermont Yankee in 2012 "assuming that many new jobs could be created through investments in new clean energy technologies, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar." That includes 47 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents. &nbsp;</li>
<li>Only 46 percent of state residents trust Entergy to clean up the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee, compared to 47 percent who do not. </li>
<li>Two thirds of Vermonters now give Entergy a low rating for "trustworthiness" -- with 37 percent saying "very low" and 29 percent "somewhat low." Only about one in four state residents (26 percent) give Entergy high marks for trustworthiness. </li>
<li>Nearly three out five state residents (58 percent) give Entergy low marks for "competence" -- with 26 percent saying "very low" and 33 percent "somewhat low." Fewer than one in three (29 percent) give Entergy high marks for competence. </li>
<li>Four out of five state residents (79 percent) have heard about the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee.&nbsp; Only 20 percent have not. </li></ul><br />
<p>For complete survey findings, go to <a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/" target="_blank"><font color="#6099e9">http://www.CivilSocietyInstitute.org</font></a> on the Web.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shell and IBM Target Oil and Natural Gas Recovery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/2010/02/shell-and-ibm-target-oil-and-natural-gas-recovery.html" />
    <id>tag:www.wattsgoingon.com,2010://9.4374</id>

    <published>2010-02-26T17:35:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-26T17:37:30Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Shell (NYSE: RDSA) and IBM ( IBM) today announced a research collaboration that aims to extend the life of oil and natural gas fields. &nbsp;Shell sees potential to reduce the time and money required to model its reservoirs. &nbsp;IBM's long-standing...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Heather Young</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Gas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wattsgoingon.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Shell (NYSE: <a title="RDSA" href="http://studio-5.financialcontent.com/prnews?Page=Quote&amp;Ticker=RDSA" target="_blank"><font color="#6099e9">RDSA</font></a>) and IBM ( <a href="http://www.ibm.com/investor" target="_blank"><font color="#6099e9">IBM</font></a>) today announced a research collaboration that aims to extend the life of oil and natural gas fields. &nbsp;Shell sees potential to reduce the time and money required to model its reservoirs. &nbsp;IBM's long-standing analytics and simulation experience will meet Shell's strong subsurface and reservoir expertise to create a more efficient, more accurate picture of energy recovery.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>The companies will explore advanced techniques for reconciling geophysical and reservoir engineering field data. &nbsp;As a result of applying improved algorithms, analytics and accelerated simulations, Shell can reduce the educated guesswork and extract natural resources with more certainty and efficiency, thereby optimizing the recovery of oil and gas.</p>
<p>"This collaboration is remarkable," said <span class="xn-person">Gerald Schotman</span>, Executive Vice President of Shell Innovation, Research &amp; Development. &nbsp;"Two industrial research giants are coming together to solve a very specific, real-world problem and make the most of oil and natural gas reservoirs. &nbsp;This will not be done through expensive, experimental facilities, but by bringing together a powerful team and powerful computers so we can be smarter than before."</p>
<p>The complex process of reconciling often-differing views of oil and natural gas fields can take several months to complete and involves measurements of production volumes, flow rates and pressures. &nbsp;For example, geophysicists must examine time-lapse seismic data from subsurface rock formations; reservoir engineers receive well and laboratory data, and geophysicists receive information - sound waves - covering wide spaces between the wells.</p>
<p>Shell and IBM will reformulate and automate the task of reconciling the different data and create an enhanced, yet practical, mathematical optimization solution. &nbsp;This can improve the cost-effectiveness of the data inversion process and, once available, will become part of Shell's proprietary reservoir modelling tool kits for application in new oil and natural gas developments as well as existing assets. &nbsp; </p>
<p>"Working with Shell is a prime example of the importance of collaborative research in the effort to build a smarter planet," said <span class="xn-person">John E. Kelly III</span>, Senior Vice President and Director of IBM Research. &nbsp;"Using predictive analytics to drive new intelligence into oil and natural gas reservoir management has the potential to extend the life of existing oil and gas fields in a responsible way." &nbsp;</p>
<p>As part of this Joint Development Agreement, IBM and Shell research scientists will work in several laboratories in both the US and <span class="xn-location">the Netherlands</span>.</p>
<p>SOURCE IBM</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
